In order to bring you the best possible user experience, this site uses Javascript. If you are seeing this message, it is likely that the Javascript option in your browser is disabled. For optimal viewing of this site, please ensure that Javascript is enabled for your browser.

The free consultation period for this content is over.

It is now only available year-round to EAPC Ivory (& above) Members, Fellows of the ESC and Young combined Members

Sex differences in symptom presentation in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Session EAPC Essentials 4 You - Award Winning Science - Population Science & public health section

Speaker Annemarijn Rachel de Boer

Event : EAPC Essentials 4 You 2020

  • Topic : coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes, acute cardiac care
  • Sub-topic : Coronary Artery Disease - Other
  • Session type : ePublication

Authors : AR De Boer (Utrecht,NL), REM Van Oosterhout (Utrecht,NL), AHEM Maas (Nijmegen,NL), FH Rutten (Utrecht,NL), ML Bots (Utrecht,NL), SAE Peters (Oxford,GB)

Authors:
AR De Boer1 , REM Van Oosterhout1 , AHEM Maas2 , FH Rutten1 , ML Bots1 , SAE Peters3 , 1University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care - Utrecht - Netherlands (The) , 2Radboud University Medical Center, Cardiology - Nijmegen - Netherlands (The) , 3University of Oxford, The George Institute for Global Health - Oxford - United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland ,

Citation:

Background: Timely recognition of patients suspected for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is important for successful treatment with reperfusion therapies. Previous research has suggested that women with ACS present with different symptoms compared with men.

Purpose: This review assesses the extent of sex differences in symptom presentation in patients with confirmed ACS, defined as a diagnosis of myocardial infarction or unstable angina.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library up to June 2019. Title-abstract screening and subsequent full-text screening was independently done by two reviewers according to predefined in- and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality of the relevant studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of a symptom being present in women relative to men were calculated using aggregated and cumulative meta-analyses as well as sex-specific pooled prevalences (PP) for each symptom.

Results: Twenty-seven studies were included. Compared to men with ACS, women with ACS had a higher odds of presenting with pain between the shoulder blades (OR 2.15; 95%CI 1.95-2.37), nausea or vomiting (OR 1.64; 95%CI 1.48-1.82) and shortness of breath (OR 1.34; 95%CI 1.21-1.48). Women had a lower odds than men of presenting with chest pain (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.63-0.78) and diaphoresis (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.94). Both men and women presented most often with chest pain (PP men 79%; 95%CI 72-85, PP women 74%; 95%CI 72-85) and other symptom prevalence also showed substantial overlap. The presence of sex differences has already been established in the early 2000’s, and newer studies have mainly been confirmatory and did not materially change the cumulative findings.

Conclusions: Women with ACS do have different symptoms at the time of presentation than men with ACS, but also show considerable overlap. Since these differences have been shown for years, symptoms of ACS should no longer be labelled as either ‘atypical’ or ‘typical’.

The free consultation period for this content is over.

It is now only available year-round to EAPC Ivory (& above) Members, Fellows of the ESC and Young combined Members

Get your access to resources

Join now
  • 1ESC Professional Members – access all ESC Congress resources 
  • 2ESC Association Members (Ivory, Silver, Gold) – access your Association’s resources
  • 3Under 40 or in training - with a Combined Membership, access all resources
Join now

Our sponsors

ESC 365 is supported by Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly Alliance, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance, Novartis Pharma AG and Vifor Pharma in the form of educational grants. The sponsors were not involved in the development of this platform and had no influence on its content.

logo esc

Our mission: To reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease

Who we are